Genealogy Jottings

Author Archive

As a gift for our December anniversary, my husband/tech advisor gave me a partially remodeled office. He knows I love offices and office supplies, and I am thrilled with the result. I cannot wait to begin another exciting year of research in my new surroundings.

He upgraded the space with following:

1. LED lighting that really brightens up the room,
2. New bookcases for the 400+ genealogy books I acquired from the estate of my father’s cousin last spring,
3. An perfectly-sized office work table we spotted in the IKEA scratch and dent department,
4. A newly-organized supply closet,
5. A Varidesk adjustable standing desk that I received for Christmas.

Everything would be perfect except for one thing. I promised myself that I would begin work in the new year in a clutter-free environment, but so far I have not achieved this goal. I have books and paper everywhere. Guess what I will spend much of today doing!

Over the past week I have seen a lot of chatter about the upcoming demise of Family Tree Maker genealogy software. As one of the more popular record-keeping software products, many genealogists rely on it for their work. Understandably, they are unhappy.

I faced the same situation some time ago when Wholly Genes discontinued my software product, The Master Genealogist (TMG). Do I see a trend developing?

The Geneablogger Thomas MacEntee seems to think so. He argues that desktop genealogy software is becoming a thing of the past. The industry is heading toward subscription-based cloud products. These offer the user several benefits including off-site storage and continuous updating.

So what should the frustrated genealogist do? For my own work, I have continued to use TMG with no problem. I like the trees and reports I can run from it. I do not want to follow the learning curve needed to effectively work in another product.

Yet I do not know how long I can continue with TMG as Windows evolves. I keep receiving prompts to upgrade to Windows 10. Will TMG play well in the new sandbox? If not, what should I do?

My long-term plan for preserving my research is to post it with Family Search. I have already submitted everything I know about my Norwegian and Finnish ancestors to them. Each time I complete a research question, I add my results to my online tree. Perhaps I can begin using their site for my work when TMG ceases to be a viable option.

The technology world continues to evolve faster than many of us would like. Family Tree Maker users, I feel your pain.

At last I have completed this year’s genealogical project, my story of Jane and Caleb Reed, and mailed it out to the relatives. Now I can celebrate Christmas, clean up the office, and prepare a research plan for next year.

Having finished research projects on all my known great-grandparents, I am now working through my sixteen great-great grandparents. Next up will be the blacksmith Thomas Sherman, 1841-1912. He lived in Illinois from about 1870 on.

This ancestor left some unanswered questions that I will work to resolve in 2016:

1. Where was he born?
2. Did he serve in the Civil War as he claimed?
3. How many times was he married, and who were his wives?

The last question poses the most interesting puzzle for me because his first wife would have been my ancestor. I know nothing about her except that according to family lore she was a German girl who came to America when she was about 8 years old. She was said to have died near Indianapolis after the birth of her only child, my great-grandmother Anna Petronellia Sherman, in 1865.

It has been several years since I last worked on Thomas’ life, and I am eager to get re-acquainted with him. What new resources will I find? Will I be taking a research trip for this project? I cannot wait to get started.

Many rural communities in Norway kept local histories called bygdebøker. These can prove quite helpful in our genealogical research. They contain a wealth of information about an area as well as chronological histories of each local farm.

My husband/tech advisor recently located a bygdebok online for a community where he suspected his great-grandmother had lived. The book provided good evidence that he had located the correct Margit Pedersdatter.

The keeper of the bygdebok had recorded information about Margit and her life on the farm in Norway. It noted that she had gone to America about the same time our Margit did.

But amazingly, the entries for Margit did not stop there. The bygdebok went on to name the husband she married in North Dakota, Syver Nelson, and their two children, Anna and Lars. Definitely our family!

Before finding this bygdebok, we had located several women in Norway as candidates for our Margit Pedersdatter. This wonderful Norwegian resource enabled us to narrow it down and make a successful leap across the pond.

As we approach Thanksgiving later this month, my thoughts turn to reasons for thankfulness. I need to practice this virtue more regularly because too often I get caught up in the frustrations of my daily life. Yet if I look at just the homesteading stories from my own family history, my frustrations look like nothing compared to what my ancestors endured. A few examples:

• Laura Riddle (1853-1933) raised a family including two disabled children while homesteading by herself in Nebraska,
• Anna Petronellia Sherman Reed (1865-1961), as an older woman in her 50’s, homestead alone in Wyoming,
• Sophie Marie Bentsen (1878-1966) spent the winter with three small children and very little food on their Montana homestead while her husband lay ill in town with typhoid.

I certainly face nothing like the life of a homesteader with complications such as children with special needs, an aging body, or a suddenly-absent spouse. Even without these challenges, homesteading was not easy.

My father’s second cousin Olive Griffith Rector provided us with tales of some of the hardships the homesteaders faced. Her family settled in Oklahoma in 1901.

In her words, they arrived at the most barren looking place one could ever imagine. Her father had put up a one-room board shack for lodging. They heated it with a little stove using cow chips. Their beds were boards placed on sawhorses. They had to carry water. That fall they began work on a dugout that was finished just in time for cold weather. It had a dirt floor they swept with a weed. They used old cement sacks on the floor if they could get them. Their mother worked in the fields for three years to save enough money for a sewing machine. Olive claimed that their father built better housing for his livestock than he did for his family. She thought they would have stayed in the dugout forever if “the roof hadn’t rotted off and it leaked like a sieve”.

Does not sound like much fun to me. These people made huge sacrifices in an effort to make a better life for themselves and their children. I can be grateful for all they did, because I have benefitted from their efforts. My parents and I did not have to live this way. My petty annoyances in the 21^st-century suburbs cannot begin to compare with the hardships of life on a homestead. These people took a long view of life and ignored everyday frustrations in their efforts to get ahead.

As is my custom, this holiday season I will add a chapter to my ongoing family history project. Each year I choose an ancestral couple, write their story, and compile relevant photos. My subjects this year are my great-great grandparents Jane and Caleb Reed of Ashmore, Illinois.

Through 2015 I have worked mostly to research Jane and her family because so much was already known about Caleb. I even had the opportunity to visit Jane’s birthplace in Wayne County, Kentucky.

Towards the end of the year I thought I had uncovered all the information I could about her. Then I decided to dig into a Boyd notebook left to me by a relative who passed away earlier this year. Jane had a sister who married a Boyd.

The notebook was not about those Boyds, but it did contain a remarkable document. In 1988, Jane’s great-grandchildren through another line had compiled a lengthy family history of their own, A Wright Interesting Story by Jean Greggs Wright and Mary Jane Wright Coartney. It contained a lot of their grandmother Martha Reed Wright’s memories of Jane, stories that had not come down through my own family.

Armed with this information, I can now prepare a much more personal account of the lives of my great-great grandparents. Before my discovery, I knew just the dates and places for Jane. Now I feel like I know her a little bit.

This discovery just goes to show the importance of searching for collateral relatives. Had I not sought to look for more information on Jane’s Boyd in-laws or recognized her daughter’s married name of Wright, I would not have found this information. My own family history will be the richer for it.

Earlier this spring I inherited the genealogy library of my father’s cousin, Alta Marie (Reed) Kaessinger. Over the summer I have cataloged most of her 400+ books, and now I have begun to look through her numerous file folders and notebooks.

I made a delightful find in a notebook this week as I pulled one labeled Boyd from the shelf. It caught my eye because I had recently discovered two Boyd cousins who reportedly perished in the Civil War. Unfortunately, this notebook mentioned nothing about them, but it did contain a family history of my great-great aunt Martha Ann Reed Wright (1849-1918), first cousin of the Boyd brothers through their mothers, Jane and Nancy Carter.

A Wright Interesting Story, prepared in 1988 by Jean Greggs Wright and Mary Jane Wright Coartney, relates much about Martha’s life. It lists her descendants, with many photos, as known when the document was written. Best of all, it provides a great deal of information on her mother (my great-great grandmother) Jane Carter Reed.

This fall, I plan to write a character sketch about an ancestral couple, as I usually do for the holidays. I had already chosen my subject for this year, Jane (Carter) and Caleb Reed. What a serendipitous find this family history makes! I now have a great deal more material for my writing project than I ever dreamed I would have. Alta collected an amazing amount of information, and it needs to be shared. Jane Carter Reed’s half of the story landed on my bookshelf just at the right time.

The Civil War has always fascinated me. Like so many families, we suffered some of the 250,000 Union losses. Perhaps that is why I feel a personal connection to the war.

Recently I discovered two more possible Civil War casualties in my family tree. If proven, both of them were first cousins of my great-grandfather Samuel Harvey Reed.

Samuel’s maternal aunt Nancy Carter married Robert Boyd in 1840 in Coles County, Illinois. This couple had four known sons. According to 1850 and 1860 U. S. census records, their two oldest children were boys, G. R. born about 1843 and Jas born about 1845. Both these boys were the right age to serve in the Civil War. Their younger male siblings, Caleb (b. abt. 1857) and John (b. abt. 1859), were too young. Why do I believe the two older sons perished in the Civil War (1861-1865)?

I have the following evidence:

1. Neither G. R. nor Jas has been found on the 1870 U. S. census. Perhaps they died before that date.
2. I have a photocopy of an undated scrapbook page created by Olive Rector, a great-great-niece of Nancy Carter Boyd. She wrote that two of Nancy and Robert Boyd’s sons, Robert and Riley, were killed in the Civil War—one at Shiloh and one at Fort Donaldson (sic).
3. The Regimental history for the 8^th Illinois, Company C (raised in Coles County) lists two Boyd casualties. Private George R. Boyd was killed near Vicksburg on 1 July 1863 and is buried there. Robert Boyd died about 20 Feb 1862 of wounds received at Ft. Donelson.

Although interesting, this evidence does not make the case that Nancy Boyd’s sons died in the war. Too many questions remain:

1. The names do not match up perfectly. I can hypothesize that the G. R. named on the census was George R. Boyd. Maybe the initial R stands for the son Riley mentioned by Olive Rector. Secondly, perhaps Jas was the Robert who died of wounds received at Fort Donelson. His full name could have been Jas Robert or Robert Jas. But without further proof, it is a stretch to conclude that the boys listed on the census are the Boyd casualties from the 8^th Illinois.
2. Olive Rector claimed that one of the sons died at Shiloh. George R. Boyd fell at Vicksburg. Was Olive mistaken about the site of the battle, or are these records for two different men? Civil War casualty lists for Shiloh do not include anyone named Boyd. A great-great-niece, writing many years later, could have named the incorrect battle.
3. Our Boyd cousins may have served in a regiment other than the 8^th Illinois.

Without further proof I cannot conclude that my great-grandfather lost his Boyd cousins in the war. If he did, I cannot say for certain which son died at which battle. I need a little more evidence to substantiate this sad conclusion.

We have a branch missing from my family tree.

My paternal grandmother never knew her father. She claimed she did not even know his name, and perhaps she didn’t. Her aunt, not her mother, raised her.

This unknown man contributed 12.5% of my ancestry, yet I have no information on his family or heritage. Endless searches of records on my grandmother and her family have yielded no clues.

Recently we embarked on our last, best hope, DNA testing. We opted for autosomal testing because we are not looking for a straight maternal or paternal line. If we could only find someone with no discernable matches to my documented family tree, that person could be related through the mystery man.

Matches have begun to come back, and most of them seem to connect through lines I currently have documented:

• One match also had Reed and Carter ancestors.
• One match and I both descend from the Puritan Edward Bangs.

Strangely, several matches came in from Australia. All the paternal ancestors I know about have lived in America since colonial times, and I know of no relatives who relocated to Australia. Could these people be related to my unknown great-grandfather?

I am just beginning to wade into this new world of DNA testing. I have learned a couple of things as I try to understand how it works. For example, descent from a common documented ancestor does not mean that the DNA match is necessarily from that ancestor. One must triangulate results to prove a match from any given ancestor.

With no scientific training beyond college biology, this DNA world presents me with a daunting learning curve. But if I ever want to discover my great-grandfather, I need to become proficient in this science.

The Sons of Norway organization encourages members to learn cultural skills reminiscent of their Norwegian heritage. They offer many courses of study including rosmaling, hardanger embroidery, Norwegian cooking, and Norwegian music. Members can work through three levels of expertise in each skill.

This week our Lodge recognized my husband/tech advisor for his mastery of Norwegian genealogy. To earn his Level 1, 2, and 3 beautifully-enameled pins, he had to research his Norwegian ancestry and complete the following:

• Seven Ancestor Charts and Family Group Sheets for people in his family tree,
• Source citations for all his information,
• Stories about three people on his pedigree charts.

To those of us who pursue American genealogy, this may sound simple. Trust me, it is not!

The researcher in Norwegian records must master many specialized skills:

• An understanding of the historical social structure of Norway because different social classes created different records.
• An ability to use the patronymic naming system because most Norwegians had no surname.
• A vocabulary of the words used in Norwegian records and an ability to read pre-20^th century handwriting.
• A familiarity with the record-keeping practices and formats used for vital records by the state Lutheran church.
• A conception of the geography and governmental administrative divisions pertaining to the area in which one’s ancestors lived.

My husband/tech advisor did all this and more. He mastered the use of the Norwegian Archives database and then taught others in our Lodge how to use it. He did lookups for those who struggled with it. And he went far beyond the number of Ancestor Charts and Family Group sheets required, even tracing one line of his family back to the 1400’s.

I hope his work is serving as an inspiration to others in our Lodge to document their own family lines. Receiving beautiful pins from the Sons of Norway for all the work makes it even more worthwhile. If you are Norwegian, join your local Lodge and get started today.